I have worked years on a side project that started with questioning Einstein's use of time dilation that seemed to appease the seventeen-year drought caused by the Michelson and Morley experiment. Einstein's use of the Lorentz transformation formula shows how special relativity is tied to the unexpected results of that 1887 experiment. Could time dilation be a shortsighted appeasement of atomic and quantum processes transpiring within the apparatus that caused both Fitzgerald and Lorentz to construct contraction formulas to explain the results of the experiment? This side project eventually led to the ideas contained in the pages of The Gravity Cycle. The science of motion must be as exact as the science of chemistry. The science of motion has been off track since its beginnings with Galileo and Newton. The motion myth, part two of this book, explains the dead end path started by Galileo and Newton and then perpetuated by Einstein and those who stand on his shoulders. In short, the gravity cycle is the big picture that eluded Einstein. It is the beginning of the science of motion that will eventually change the way we understand motion in the universe, from large bodies of mass, like suns and planets, to individual and bonded atoms. The gravity cycle introduces from an atomic and quantum perspective the science of momentum, the science of relativity, and the science of gravity united in a way that has never been done before. It explains how spherical bodies play a vital role in keeping gravitational energy flowing throughout a galaxy and throughout the universe. Drop a penny four feet from a hard surface. Watch how it literally acquires energy and then bounces and keeps bouncing smaller and smaller bounces until it loses that acquired energy and eventually comes to a perceived position of rest on the surface of the floor. This is no different than watching a chemical reaction taking place in a beaker. Science can explain what happens in a beaker, but it can't explain on an atomic/quantum level what is happening within the penny. Presently, the science of motion can be compared to the pre-Lavoisier days in the science of chemistry. I am now putting my twenty-year project on the table to be examined and criticized. My hope is that we don't make the same mistake as the recording companies that ignored Brian Epstein's pitch that "I have four boys that will be bigger than Elvis." The gravity cycle is bigger than Einstein. Martin O. Cook